Music 343 Paper

Fall 2008


Paper—Two Approaches to Writing about Music

Selecting a Piece
Part I
Part II
Format
Possible Topics
Grade
Dates
Library Resources Page for Music 343

Selecting a Piece

You can choose any piece of music written before 1750. The score can be taken from NAWM or from any scholarly edition. Research materials are harder to find for some pieces than for others, and you must do some preliminary work in the library before you make your final decision. Only two other restrictions apply: you must choose a piece that interests you, and you must choose a piece for which you can find both score and recording.

Return to top


The Paper—Part I

The paper must include two parts. In Part I, you must thoroughly describe one of the first performances of the piece you have chosen—but you must describe it as if you were there! To begin Part I, imagine that you are a real person at one of the first performances of your piece. You can be the composer, a performer, or a listener. You could be a medieval monk at Vespers, a Renaissance lady at court, a merchant attending Mass, a Baroque musician in the orchestra pit of a Venetian opera house, or whatever you choose. Once you decide who you want to be, learn all you can about the appropriate setting for the musical performance: Your research must lead you to a variety of library resources (books, scholarly journals and periodicals, etc.) about many subjects (history, architecture, art, etc.)—NOT JUST MUSIC!

When research is done, write a detailed account of your quasi-fictional experience (à la Barbara Lachman’s Journal of Hildegard of Bingen) in which you describe:

Identify who you are, to whom you are writing to, and why. Part I could be a letter to a distant friend or employer, or it could be an entry in a personal journal written for your own pleasure and reflection. This is creative writing, but it must be based on solid research.

Return to top


The Paper—Part II

In Part II, write an analysis of the same piece (or an excerpt, if it is a major work, e.g., concerto, oratorio, opera, etc.) as if you were a 21st century music student (which you are!). We are not looking for copious research in Part II—we want you to study & listen to the score and come up with your own analysis. Use all the tools you have learned in theory and history courses to describe principal style features, the structure (form), the relation of words and music (if applicable), and so on. Your work in Part I may illuminate this study, and vice versa. Try to go beyond mere description and consider such questions as: Return to top


Format

Part I must be at least 3 pages long (word-processed, double-spaced). Document your sources either with footnotes (see Lachman’s Journal), endnotes, or by annotating the Part I bibliography (if you feel footnotes would look out of place in an “authentic” account written before 1750!). Part II must be at least 2 pages long (word-processed, double-spaced).

Summary:

  1. Title Page
  2. Part I (3 pages)
  3. Part II (2 pages)
  4. Bibliography
  5. The score (only if not in NAWM and your instructor does not own a copy)

The bibliography must follow MLA format. For a “B” grade on your bibliography you must include at least the following items; for an “A” grade you will need to add a variety of other materials that deal specifically with your topic.

Return to top


Possible Topic Choices

Return to top


Grade

If you follow all of the steps above and take the time to do a decent job on your paper, any of you can easily earn an A or B. In Part I, we want to see evidence of careful research and creativity. In Part II, we want to see your own thoughtful analysis, one that demonstrates knowledge of the music and its style. Both Parts should be “ready for publication”—that is, the writing should be clear and purposeful with no distractions of grammar, punctuation, spelling, or format.

Parts of the paper will be weighted as follows when we assign grades:

Part I 40%
Part II 30%
Bibliography 30%

—10% will be subtracted from your grade if you do not bring a complete first draft to class and participate in the peer review exercise on Wednesday, December 3.
—Late final drafts will lose one full letter grade.

Return to top


Dates

Monday, August 25—First Day of Class
Start looking at potential paper topics.

Friday, August 29—Library Orientation
Class meeting in the library to learn about basic music research tools and sources relevant to your paper.

Browse through NAWM for possible paper topics.

Friday, September 19—List of Paper Topics (with Encounter 2)
Hand in a list of three possible paper topics.

Begin looking for bibliographic materials in the library. This library work will help you choose your topic. Submit interlibrary loan orders NOW.

Monday, October 6—Final Paper Topic & Short Bibliography (with Encounter 3)
Hand in you final paper topic choice.

Hand in a short, preliminary bibliography (5 entries in MLA format) that includes:

Begin to flesh out your bibliography.

Monday, October 20—Final Bibliography (with Encounter 4)
Hand in the final bibliography (for Parts 1 & 2), typed and properly formatted. It must follow MLA format and must include at least the 10 “minimum” items listed under Format above.

Begin to map out the main points and arguments of your paper.

Monday, November 3—Paper Outline (with Encounter 5)
Hand in a one-page outline, flowchart, idea map, or summary of your paper.

Begin work on the first draft of your paper.

Wednesday, December 3—Complete First Draft
Bring complete first draft of your paper to class for a peer review exercise. Exercise will focus on strength of arguments and clarity of presentation.

Use written feedback to revise your paper.

Monday, December 8, 4:00 pm—Final Draft
Final version of paper is due.
 

Return to top

Page created 8/24/08 by Mark Harbold—last updated 8/24/08.